The response to
my opening post in this series has been excellent, and I thank everyone who took the time to comment. I am very encouraged, and I
hope that this exchange of information continues. Several of you took some time to offer
detailed observations, and I will be getting to at least some of them, because
they make good points. But I
want to begin with a more general comment I received, because it echoes the
basic theme of my whole approach to urban revival. It reflects just what Phoenixville’s
revival is all about, and the great contrast with what is happening to Conshohocken.
A lady wrote
to tell me “why Phoenixville” for her and her husband, who are not from
Pennsylvania, but moved there after checking it out. She didn’t offer a historical “why,” but a
cultural one. In Phoenixville, she says,
“…we walk our dog
down to Bridge Street and the Farmers Market, greet/meet neighbors along the
way…”
To me, that
pretty much says it all. First and
foremost, the walking part; a livable town is a walkable town. The automobile only pits residents against
one another, over everything from safety priorities to “owning” a shoveled
parking space. Second, Phoenixville
possesses “a downtown to go to.” How
many other towns on the Schuylkill River can make that statement? Okay, Norristown’s West Marshall Street, but
isn’t that pretty much about it? That
downtown also isn’t just Starbucks or wine bars; the Farmers Market is a
community destination, as is the Colonial Theater, and there are more. Third, the opportunity to “greet/meet
neighbors along the way” may be the most important component of all. That comes from walking, of course, not
driving, but it also speaks to the type of people who live there; those who
experience the community from outside, not isolated in some new high-rise
apartment.
This comment excellently summed up how
Phoenixville is conducting its ascent, and the type of people it attracts as
new residents. This couple came, liked
what they saw, and decided to not just stay, but contribute to what was
happening, even if just by walking downtown (and actually talking to
people!). But why was what they liked
there at all?
As a
historian, I believe we must begin by giving credit to where credit is due, and
some of that goes back a long way. Phoenixville
has the best-preserved “Main Street” (it’s Bridge Street in Phoenixville) of
all the towns on the lower Schuylkill River.
Many great buildings were lost, but others survived, enough to anchor a
modern revival of an old time downtown. The importance of historic preservation
cannot be overstated. A Phoenixville
that had to rebuild all of Bridge Street would not have become the Phoenixville
of today. Those old buildings are a
legacy that far exceeds their property value.
Thus, when we are apportioning credit, we must make sure to look far
enough back to acknowledge those who contributed to this. I suspect there are many names, both of
individuals and of companies.
Still, a
town’s revival isn’t just a matter of having old buildings on an even older
street. The physical components were
present in Phoenixville, but the purposes they were put to made all the
difference. Phoenixville’s nightlife
gets most of the ink, and those old buildings are great settings for just that,
but I suspect that the writer of the comment I am referencing and her husband
are not in the age demographic that is found in those places on Friday and Saturday evenings. People who come into town to party make a town “trendy,” stimulate business and certainly make a contribution.
But it is the people who live in the town,
who pay taxes and vote, who are the backbone of the sense of community that has
arisen.
People are
attracted to small towns for different reasons, of course. In my previous blog series on what is
happening to the Conshohockens, I predicted that a great many of the people who
will move there will do so primarily because the location offers quick access
to two Interstate highways. They may choose
Conshohocken over similar locations because of the area’s great natural beauty,
but that will be the clincher, not the motivation. I also questioned how many will actually take
a sufficient interest in their new home town to get involved, and whether their
primary interests might conflict with those of the existing residents uphill. My concern is about Conshohocken’s future as
a community, not just valuable real
estate.
Nobody is
moving to Phoenixville for its great access to Interstate highways. They aren’t very far away, but rush hour
traffic on the local roads from Phoenixville to them makes the journey take
rather long. People who move to
Phoenixville are attracted by what the town itself has to offer. Of course location counts; Phoenixville’s
surroundings are rich in history and culture, and there is no point in making a
distinction between the Borough and its adjacent townships in that regard.
I would argue
strongly that what Phoenixville has to offer begins with “walkable streets and
a downtown to go to.” Without those two,
a town’s revival may be measured in economic terms, but not in those things
that really go into making a town a community.
That’s the
beginning, the basic requirements. But
they aren’t enough by themselves, and piecing together the story behind
Phoenixville’s revival will require the addition of several more
components. That’s why I repeat my call
for contributions, because there is a lot more to be said. I plan to say more, but as always, I take my
inspiration from what people in the Schuylkill Valley say and do, and the many
people responsible for Phoenixville’s revival each know more than I do. A historian cannot make bricks without straw,
and that straw must come from the knowledgeable, as many of them as possible.
Several of the
comments I have received speak of Phoenixville’s “air,” its “DNA,” and its
sense of “tolerance and inclusion.” Some
attribute this to religion, but more often to traditions left from when
Phoenixville was a “company town.” These
are subjects I want to address, so if you have thoughts on this, let me know soon. I would like to consider them before I write about the subjects themselves.
No comments:
Post a Comment