In my First Friday post in October of
last year, I published the first of a series about ethnicity and immigration,
focusing as always on my subject towns along Pennsylvania’s lower Schuylkill
River. Much of the inspiration for this
came from my friend Hank Cisco, the Ambassador of Norristown. He is a man with an amazing memory, and among
the many memories he related to me were those of the suffering and
discrimination Italians faced in Norristown, Pa. in the early years of this
century. In this, Norristown was hardly
unique; in fact it demonstrated yet again why the town, its people and its
history, are so very evocative of American history in general.
Just recently, Hank inspired me again, with a Facebook post on his
timeline. It contains a meme with a photo
of Italian immigrants waving small American flags, and the following text:
“Legal Italian immigrants didn’t wave
Italian flags coming into America. They
didn’t riot and try to stop the election process. They didn’t try to make America speak
Italian. They learned English.”
The comments on this post contained several references to immigrant
ancestors, and how hard they worked to earn a place in the American Dream. Both Hank and his commentators speak for the way things actually were.
Italian immigrants—not to mention others, including Jews from many
countries—lived honest, hard-working and law-abiding lives. These people did
arrive, go to work—at whatever was offered—and quietly build lives for
themselves and their children. This was
the reality.
But as I pointed out in my first post, the public perception of Italians
was something quite different from the day-to-day reality. As early as 1891, before there actually very
many Italians in America, eleven of them were lynched in New Orleans, by a mob
that included several local prominent citizens, because they believed these
strangers had murdered the Police Chief.
The lynching took place the day after a trial had acquitted them,
because the mob believed the jury had been bought. And this was early in the story. By the 1920s, as I quoted popular author Bill
Bryson, “Wherever problems arose,
Italians seemed to be at the heart of things.
The widespread perception of Italians was that if they weren’t Fascists
or Bolsheviks, they were anarchists or Communists, and if they weren’t those,
they were involved in organized crime.”
In other words, in the early decades of the 20th century,
there was a substantial gap between the perception of Italians and the far more
mundane reality. But many years have passed,
and Italians have now entered the American body politic in both reality and
perception. That perception is now more congruent
with reality, recognizing that excepting the bad element that exists within
every such group, the vast majority of Italian immigrants—and the others—lived
just as Hank and the post’s contributors pointed out.
Why was there such a gap between the perception and the reality of
Italian immigrants to the U.S.? There is
always a gap between perception and reality, on pretty much any major
subject. Still, claiming Italian
immigrants were either Fascists, Communists, Anarchists or criminals clearly
had no basis in reality. That is the truth that Hank and his respondents make
clear in that Facebook post. Yet, it was
what people believed.
The answer to the question “why did people believe that?” is
complicated, but a shorthand version isn’t:
people always have been, are now and always will be suspicious of anyone
that is “different.” Such people possess
what Brett Harte referred to as “the defective moral quality of being a
stranger.” It’s always been about
different languages and customs, but in America, how light their skin was has
had a lot to do with it. I wrote in an
earlier post about how the predominance of darker skinned Italians from Sicily
played a part in generating hatred, although they are pretty much accepted as
white by now.
Norristown was the scene of such ethnic hatred and distrust, and that
unpleasant scenario played out over a very long time. Rank discrimination against Italians was the
norm until after the mid-20th century, and lingering resentment of
their growing influence fueled the bruising political battles among
ethnicity-based Borough Councilmen that contributed so greatly to Norristown’s
decline in the century’s second half.
And it lasted longer than you might think; indeed, I’m not sure it is
entirely gone today. I remember a
conversation I had about twenty years ago with a friend who was also a politician/officeholder
in the Norristown area at the time (I’m not going to come any closer to
identifying him). He launched into a
tirade against “the people who have always caused most of the trouble around
here.” When I asked who they were, he
replied, “You know, the people whose last names end with a vowel.” I suppressed a smile (he had clearly forgotten
how my last name is spelled) and I realized he was talking about Italians.
That’s anti-Italian feeling lasting over one
hundred years in the Norristown area, because I’m not sure he was alone
in his opinion. But by that time,
anti-Hispanic feeling was growing, spurred by the growth of the town’s Hispanic
population, and Italian Americans were part of it. The current anti-immigrant attitude is now
bolstered by the “illegal immigrant” argument first created as a reaction to
Italians. The irony just keeps
coming.
And here we are today, amidst a considerable negative reaction to the
latest group of (largely) dark, swarthy immigrants. I have been trained to look at subjects like
this; it’s a professional thing. That’s
why I ask whether the enormous gap between perception and reality that Italians
and other ethnic immigrants endured in the early years of their arrival might
also exist today in regard to Hispanics.
As I wrote in my first post, “could
Hispanics today—and perceptions of them—be playing a role similar to that of
the Italians back then?”
Fortunately, that role no longer includes being lynched, but the attacks
against Hispanics (not to mention those against Middle East refugees) clearly
echo what Italians had to suffer for decades.
Are today’s immigrants arriving only for the “free stuff,” with no
desire to work? Do they “riot and try to
stop the election process”? Or might the
reality be quite different, as it was with Italians and so many other
ethnicities?
Given the text of the meme Hank published, I feel it is safe to say that a perception/reality gap may exist today, one that may be as large as the one Italians suffered under for so long. By now, it appears that Italians have migrated from one side of the gap to the other. Does this help Norristown?